The use of block printing

The use of block printing

The word ‘printing’ implies a process that uses pressure, being derived from a Latin word meaning pressing. The German word druck for print also means pressure. And there is no doubt that the first textile-printing technique (making impressions) was that using blocks with raised printing surfaces, which were inked and then pressed on to the fabric.

By repetition, the image from a single block builds up into a complete design over the fabric area. Some early blocks were made of clay or terracotta, others of carved wood. Wooden blocks carrying design motifs were found in tombs near the ancient town of Panopolis in Upper Egypt. In the same area a child’s tomb contained a tunic made of fabric printed with a design of white rectangles, each enclosing floral motifs on a blue background. Pliny (born AD 23) described in his book Historia naturalis how in Egypt they applied colourless substances to a fabric that was later immersed in a dyebath that quickly produced several colours. As Pliny also records that the best-quality alum was obtained from Egypt, it seems likely that alum was one of the mordants used and that the dye was madder. By the 14th century the use of wooden blocks for printing was certainly established in France, Italy and Germany, but the craft was practised by ‘painters’, using mineral pigments rather than dyes. One of the early European uses of blocks was to produce church hangings that imitated the more expensive brocades and tapestries. Cennini, writing in 1437, described in some detail the production and use of brick-sized wooden blocks to print a black outline on brightly coloured cloth, which was then handpainted with other bright colours [1]. In 1460 the nuns of a convent in Nuremberg described the block printing of mineral colours in boiled resinous oils, of gold and silver leaf, and of wool ‘flock’ on to a printed adhesive. The later development of block printing is described in section. In the 15th century Portuguese traders were discovering the potential for trade with India, where the dyed style was used to produce cotton fabrics of great beauty that were quickly in demand in Europe. As early as the first century AD there was an Indian centre famous for the production of painted fabric [3], and the use of madder was by then long established. Early in the 17th century hand-painted Indian cottons were reaching London in significant quantities. They were both colourful and colour-fast, and introduced a richness of novel and stimulating design styles. Paisley designs, for example, were derived directly from one of these styles and the words ‘calico’ and ‘chintz’ were adopted into the language at around this time. A substantial and lucrative

import trade began, reaching a peak about 1700. In 1708, Daniel Defoe wrote that ‘everything that used to be wool or silk was supplied by the Indian trade’. The craftsmanship applied to produce these prints can be judged from the following summary of the process. The cloth was wetted with milk and burnished to achieve a smooth surface. The design was transferred from paper, using charcoal powder that was rubbed through holes pricked in the paper. The main outlines were painted in and the fabric was then waxed, except for the areas that were to be blue or green. The latter were dyed in a bath of reduced indigo, and the wax was then removed by scraping and washing. After drying, the reds, pinks, lilacs, browns and blacks were painted in with the appropriate metal acetate mordants, aged and developed in a madder extract dyebath. If necessary, the pale areas were rewaxed and darker colours obtained by a second dyeing. Thorough washing removed most of the unfixed dye, and then bleaching in the sun whitened the ground. Painting in a saffron yellow for green and yellow areas completed the work. The desire to imitate these prints in order to compete in the new market was soon aroused. Merchants who had earlier organised the production of larger quantities by the Indians, and who had also encouraged them to speed up the process by using block printing, turned to the foundation of factories in Europe near the main ports of entry. In 1648 the first recorded calico-printing factory was set up in Marseille. In 1676 there were units in Amsterdam and London. Among the merchants who financed the trade was one of the best known Huguenot families, the Deneufvilles, and before the end of the century the Huguenots had established the new industry in Berlin, Bremen, Frankfurt, Neuchatel, Lausanne and Geneva [4]. The importance of printing in the commerce of Europe was very significant in the 18th century and the growth of the textile industry was clearly stimulated by the demand for prints. The British prohibition of printed cotton in 1721 actually helped because Lancashire-woven linen/cotton ‘fustians’, which used flax grown in the Fylde area, were exempt. The linen yarn provided a strong warp, and the developing industry moved from London to the Manchester region, and also to Northern Ireland and Scotland where flax was also grown. The factory system of spinning had not yet been developed; it was not until 1766 that Hargreaves invented the spinning jenny. Yet in 1729 there were already four Dutch printers employing more than 100 workers in each unit. In Britain the number of calico-printing firms grew from 28 in 1760 to 111 in 1785, with annual production rising to 12 million yards, and in 1792 it was estimated that at least 60% of the white cotton cloth produced was sent to the printers. After 1774, when Richard Arkwright achieved the repeal of the 1721 Prohibition Act, most of the growth was in the printing of 100% cotton fabric. Liverpool now became the centre for raw cotton import.How had the European printers acquired the necessary skills? Making wooden blocks would not be too difficult but finding suitable thickeners may have taken time.

Gum Senegal and tragacanth seem to have emerged as useful, and starch was added to improve the colour yield. A combination of block printing and painting (usually described as pencilling) was used for some time. The biggest problem was that of achieving bright and fast colours. Madder was the most important dye that was able to satisfy the need. It had been known, and used with a mordant, since Saxon times but not in prints or on cotton. Awareness of what the Indians had achieved was important, and information about their methods would be gleaned from merchants and from returned missionaries. As late as 1742 details of the method were being sought from a French Jesuit in Pondicherry by a friend in France. The importance of pretreating the cotton with milk fat may have been a vital piece of information, though olive oil became the preferred material in Europe. Attaining a bright red was a preoccupation for many years, and recipes became more and more complicated. The processes of ageing the print and clearing the last traces of madder from unprinted areas also presented new problems that were not solved immediately.