The Proposed Wage Structure 2010 for the Garments Workers of Bangladesh
The Proposed Wage Structure 2010 for the Garments

The Proposed Wage Structure 2010 for the Garments  Workers of Bangladesh

Workers of Bangladesh


Class
Wage – Year 2006
In Taka
Wage – Year 2010
In Taka
Rate of
Increase
%
       Grade 1
           5,140
           9,300
          80.93
       Grade 2
           3,840
           7,200
          87.50
       Grade 3
           2,449
           4,120
          68.23
       Grade 4
           2,250
           3,763
          67.24
       Grade 5
           2,046
           3,455
          68.87
       Grade 6
           1,851
           3,210
          73.42
       Grade 7
           1,662
           3,000
          80.45
   Apprentice
           1,200
           2,500
        108.33
*The apprenticeship period is 3 months, but if the apprentice cannot attain satisfactory efficiency by that time, the factory owners will be able to extend the period by another 3 months. (For details of workers by designations, see Appendix I).  
Source: Rahman, 1 August 2010. P. 13.
The Bangladesh Garments Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BGMEA) said that they were not sure if all industrial units of the sector would be able to pay as per the new wage structure from 01 November 2010, but that they would be inspired to pay the workers at the new rate of payment. The Bangladesh Knitwear Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BKMEA) said that the production of factories had fallen by 40% for various reasons and called upon the government to solve the problems of gas and electricity before the implementation of this pay structure (Rahman, 1 August 2010. P. 13).              
 Appealing to the garments owners to be more cordial to the problems of the workers, the government has also assured that the garments workers will be provided with subsidized rationing facilities for rice and wheat on behalf of the government (Ittefaq, 1 August 2010, P.11).
IV. Workers’ Reaction to the New Wage Structure 2010
Immediate reaction of the workers to the new wage structure was widespread violence. They came down in tens of thousands on the streets from garments factories almost all over the country. They set fire on garments factories, broke instruments of factories and cars of factory owners, including those of innocent people, and shopping malls on the streets. Thus they created a panic and havoc all around the country in and around the garments factories, which turned difficult and almost impossible for the law enforcing agencies to control. This widespread havoc, which was widely and exclusively covered by the national and international print and electronic media continued for three to four consecutive days in the country causing, according to the BGMEA, Taka 8.75 billion losses to the garments industry alone.
The causes of violence was that the Wage Board did not pay heed to garments workers’ long continued demand of Taka 5 thousand as minimum wage, but instead set Taka 3 thousand as minimum wage. The agitating leaders of the workers’ organizations rejected the three party joint decisions of the Government, BGMEA and Workers’ representatives saying that they declared to accept the wage structure without any discussion with the actual leaders of the workers. They say that the wage structure has been imposed upon the workers only through sittings with the government assisted leaders of the workers’ organizations. Their appeal was by discussing the issue with the actual leaders of the workers, and implement it from 28 April 2010 (Ittefaq, 3 August 2010, P.2).          
Some experts claim that since there are no trade union facilities in the garments industries the spontaneous resentment of the workers went beyond control. They suggest that just as the owners have the right of association and to elect their own representatives, the workers also should have their right of association and trade union facilities, so that they can elect their own representatives to bargain with the owners. If this had been done earlier, the incidents that occurred after the declaration of the wage structure 2010, could be avoided (Selim, 12 August 2010, P.9).
According to those that argue against the declared wage structure for Bangladeshi garments workers, the minimum wage of an unskilled worker necessary to pay for food, clothing, shelter, health care, etcetera at the present level of commodity prices should actually be more than Taka 5,000. Since the garments workers are semi-skilled, their reasonable wage should be Taka 6/7 thousand, which is above the wage that the considerate garments workers demanded. Moreover, these workers get much lower wage than their counterparts in other countries like China, India, Vietnam, Pakistan etcetera whose apparels mainly compete with those of Bangladesh in the world market (Table II).   
Table II. Comparative minimum wages of garments workers in some competing countries
Country
Wage per Month
$
Wage per Hour
$
             Turkey   
                N.A
                 2.44
             Mexico
                N.A
                 2.17
             China
                300
                 1.44
             India
                106
                 0.51
            Vietnam
                  92
                 0.44
            Pakistan
                116
                 0.56
            Sri Lanka
                 92
                 0.44
            Bangladesh
                 25
                 0.22
Source: Selim, 22 July 2010, P. 9. Turkey and Mexico figures are from Uddin, 21 July 2010, P.11. The principal source of data produced by these authors is a World Bank (WB) study.
From the comparative picture of minimum wages depicted in Table II, it can be argued that even if the Bangladeshi apparels workers’ demand for Taka 5 thousand as minimum wage is accepted, they will receive less than $ 72 per month or $ 0.34 per hour, which still remains the lowest among the comparator countries. So the argument which the garments owners always make that, if the wages of the workers are increased this industry will lose its external competitiveness is not tenable. One may raise the question of productivity of the Bangladeshi garments workers, but even under that consideration the Bangladeshi garments workers are deprived. According to a WB account a Bangladeshi worker by producing 2536 numbers of T-shirts per year gets $290, whereas an Indian worker gets $668 by producing only 56 more T-shirts per year. According to a Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD) account, export earnings of the garments industries in 2001-02 was $4.58 billion of which a little more than $0.22 billion was paid to the workers, which is only 5% of the total earnings, although by the sweat of the workers value added was 31% of the total value (Selim, 22 July 2010, P. 9). 
Garments industry has turned into a main pillar of the Bangladesh economy, accounting for three-fourth of the country’s total export earnings. The garments owners have been able to spread an idea that this is their main or paramount credit.  But the actual truth is that there is no backward linkage in the Bangladesh garments sector to speak about; as a result the lion-share of the value added here is the contribution of the labour power, if not the whole. The main foundation and source of the rapid expansion of the Bangladesh garments industry is the cheap labour power. In Bangladesh the intensity of capital per worker is very low (1/3 in comparison to China). The owners of the garments industry could own so large amounts of wealth mainly in exchange of the self-sacrifice of the workers who do bone-breaking work day and night at unusually low wages. So if any one is to be recognized as Commercially Important Person (CIP) and given some special advantages, it is the 3 to 4 million garments workers of Bangladesh who are the real Hero, not the tax-avoiding millionaire owners (Selim, 12 August 2010, P.9). The argument that the garments workers should get their just wage is thus incontrovertible.
It is ironic that when garments workers are being deprived of their rightful wages, the pomp and granger and standard of living of the garments owners are gradually increasing. Many of them purchasing first class air tickets and booking five star hotels abroad go on luxurious world tour with their family members once or twice every year. They hesitate little while spending money in such a lavish manner, but if the question of giving the workers just wages and minimum of facilities arise they always wail ‘if this is done the industry will be ruined. Business is very bad these days’ (Selim, 22 July 2010, P. 9). Such practice of the garments owners does not even conform to the principles of wage determination in Islam as shown above in Section II, 03. It is simply the capitalistic exploitative indifference (parallel to coercive methods that is followed in socialism) which they show to the just interests of the workers who turn into sweat their blood every day in garments factories. This is simply unjust. Allāh does not accept it. Al Qur’ân reveals, “Allāh hath favoured some of you above others in provision. Now those who are more favoured will by no means hand over their provision to those (slaves) whom their right hands possess, so they may be equal with them in respect thereof. Is it then the grace of Allāh that they deny?”16/71            
It is not only in Bangladesh, the garments workers are discontented all over the world. The difference is that workers elsewhere do not adopt the policy of breaking and setting fire to factories as the Bangladeshi workers do. To put forth their grievances, they may choose the way of agitation but they do not violate the law. China also faces the events of discontents. The workers there come to the cities to do bone-breaking work, leaving behind the painful village life, but for that they demand reasonable remunerations. They are unwilling to work shutting down eyes-ear-mouth like their predecessors. Before or after work, the discontented garments workers demand increase in wage by standing on the roads – such incidents are occurring much in China (Royel, 16 August 2010, P. 20).           
The way in which the garments workers of Bangladesh reacted to the new wage structure is also un-Islamic. Al Qur’ân reveals, “But seek the abode of the Hereafter in which Allāh hath given thee and neglect not thy portion of the world, and be thou kind even as Allāh hath been kind to thee, and seek not destructive affairs in the earth; verily! Allāh loveth not those who seek destructive affairs”. 28/77 It is Islamic, as said above (in Section II, 03), that the wage will be determined on the basis of free will and voluntary mutual understanding of the employer and the employee.  
V. Owners’ reaction to the new Wage Structure 2010
(i) Problems faced by the owners
The crisis of the apparels industry are not limited merely to the wages and allowances of the workers. The production of the factories has come down to a half, export has decreased, and the price of the apparels is decreasing in the international market. The owners of the apparels industry say that the supply of gas and electricity is not continuous, because of which they are compelled to use generators to keep the production process of the factories continuous. This results in increasing cost of production. But it is urgent to reduce the cost of production to keep the price competitive in the international market. The related entrepreneurs say that if the government fails to supply sufficient gas and electricity then industrialization in this country will be hampered.    
Moreover, serious and untoward incidents are being occurred on the basis of rumours and petty demands; it has become a ploy to destroy factories by spreading news of misbehaviour of the factory owners with the workers, which is tarnishing the image of Bangladesh as an exporting country in the outside world (Dilal, 11 July 2010, P.13).
But it cannot also be denied that sometimes there occur abnormal deaths of workers in the garments factories (Ittefaq. 24 July 2010, P.1 and Ittefaq, 27 July 2010, P. 1). It is also alleged that the kidney disease is widespread among the garments workers as they are discouraged to drink water during their duty period, because if they drink water during their duty time they may have to repeatedly go to the urinal (Selim, 22 July 2010, P. 9). This is inhuman, whereas Al Qur’ân reveals that, “I would not make it hard for thee, Allāh willing, thou will find me of the righteous.”28/27         
(ii) Falling trend of the prices of apparels in the international market
Export Promotion Bureau and BGMEA sources say that apparels prices in the international market are gradually falling recently. Table III shows the price per dozen at which the foreign buyers purchased apparels from Bangladesh in the last 16 years from 1994-95 to 2009-2010 (July to November) (Hasan, 26 July 2010, P. 2).
Table III. Apparels price per dozen at which the foreign buyers
purchased during 1994 – 95 to 2009 – 2010 (July to November)
Year
Price per Dozen in $
1994-95
35.65
1995-96
35.38
1996-97
37.06
1997-98
38.52
1998-99
39.63
1999-00
38.87
2000-01
39.19
2001-02
32.64
2002-03
32.31
2003-04
31.23
2004-05
30.22
2005-06
28.85
2006-07
27.69
2007-08
27.50
2008-09
26.82
2009-10 (July-November)
26.62
Source: Hasan, The Daily Ittefaq, 58th Year, No.211, 26 July 2010, P. 2.
Table III shows that apparels prices increased gradually from 1994-95 to 2000-01 with a slight fall in the year 1995-96 compared to the immediate past year, after which the prices jumped; then from 2001-02 prices fell continuously till 2009-10. For this reason, the apparels owners were unwilling to accept Taka 5,000 as minimum wage for the garments workers, because this will, in their view, adversely affect the garments sector (Hasan, 26 July 2010, P. 2). The owners proposed Taka 2,513 as minimum wage for the second time, whereas the visiting General Secretary of the International Textile, Garments and Leather workers Federation said, after meeting separately with both the owners and the workers at Dhaka that, it will cause no harm to the industry if Taka 5,000 is given to the workers as minimum wage (Jugantar, 23 July 2010, P. 2). Afterwards, as a result of the intervention made by the government, the BGMEA accepted the new wage structure with Taka 3,000 as minimum wage for the garments workers of Bangladesh. If it is just, there is no question; but if unjust, in that case Allāh says, “Woe unto the defrauders, those who when they take the measure from mankind demand it full, but if they measure unto them or weigh for them, they cause them loss.”83/1-3
Garments workers sweat their blood in the process of production of garments in the factories and it is alleged that for months after months the owners do not come to the factories; the factories are usually run by the salaried officials who habitually misbehave with the hard working labourers of the factories (Khayer, 29 July 2010, P. 2) It is Haram (not permissible) to consume the fruits of the workers by sitting idle without their consent (Alam, 2003, P.200-201); this negates the usual capitalist concept that “its highest executives spend their time sitting on public committees, and have to have deputies to do their work” (Lewis (1954), 1963, P.412) – as this is improper.       
(iii)  Alleged attempts to destroy the Garments Sector:  Six causes:
The garments owners claim that a certain quarter has started hatching conspiracy to destroy the garments sector of the country. The external miscreants by intruding the garments establishments in the guise of workers have started misdeeds. They are being instigated and used by certain interested quarters from outside.
The concerned parties have identified six causes behind the attempts to destroy the garments sector.  These are: (a) the foreign buyers’ recent inclination to Bangladesh, (b) The instigation of some external powers, (c) the assistance of local influential quarters and the so called labour leaders, (d) the intrusion of the jutting outs miscreants in to the garments factories, (e) the differences of opinions of the political miscreants centering the occupation of the ‘Jhut’ sector, and (f) the internal feud among the labour leaders. The actual workers have no affiliation with these factors. The garments establishments are getting jobs these days (Badal, 2 August 2010, P. 2)    
May be there is a conspiracy to harm the garments sector of Bangladesh but when the disturbances in this sector erupts, tens of thousands of workers come down on the streets which is pictured in the national and international electronic media. It is illogical to conclude that all of them are miscreants; there may be some who fan the fire of discontents in the minds of the deprived workers. If the workers are satisfied with and had there been no serious discontents in the minds of the workers about what is going on in this sector, it is obvious that it would have been almost impossible to drag down on the streets tens of thousands of innocent workers by a single or a series of “mobile calls of the miscreants from outside” as is alleged by some experts (Dey, 1 August 2010, P.11) and at the same time the disguised miscreants inside the factories could do little harm to this sector. Our habit is to expect too much from law and law enforcing agencies, we forget that they have some natural limits to their capacities; they can at best suppress the problems for the time being but not permanently cure the actual problems prevailing in the factories. It is the owners of the factories who can play the pivotal role in bringing about peace in the factories by allowing the workers their due share to their produce in the factories in the form of satisfactory wages and allowances by cutting down the excess profits they earn. It is not permissible in Islam to earn excessive profits by coercing the working class or the purchasers of commodities. Islam prefers to advise the business community to ascertain a middle course in between the highest and the lowest margin of profits for success in both the worlds, here and the Hereafter.   
The garments owners will have to understand that the minimum wage of a garments worker is Taka 1,662 (now Taka 3,000). Actually the new basic wage rate is Taka 2,000, while the minimum basic pay for a government employee is Taka 6,545. Of the remaining Taka 1,000, Taka 800 is house rent allowance and Taka 200 is medical allowance, which like other allowances are not usually included in the basic wage/pay in any other services as has been done in the case of wage of the garments workers; It is difficult for the workers to sustain their life under the prevailing high prices of daily necessities with this meagre amount of money. As a result, suppressed despair and discontent is naturally there in the minds of the workers (Hydar, 15 May 2010, P. 2), which burst out from time to time, as we see, in the factories causing unrest and disturbances in this sector. To control this is beyond the capacity of the law enforcing agencies, and the government, too, cannot and should not always shoulder such selfish interests and responsibilities of the private factory owners at public costs even though the factory owners pay taxes. They are to solve their own problems by bringing contentment in the mind of the workers by allowing them satisfactory wages. Government can at best assist them in this regard. Al Qur’ân reveals, “Help ye one another unto righteousness and pious duty. Help not one another unto sin and transgression, but keep your duty to Allāh”.5/2       
(iv) International conspiracy
BGMEA sources are often heard to official say that some interested quarters are hatching conspiracies to divert the attention of the buyers from the Bangladeshi apparels industry. Rival competing countries allegedly create unrest in the industry and instigate the garments workers to engage in destructive activities such as breaking and setting fire to garments factories. It has been seen that factories where wages and allowances are satisfactory, in other words the compliance factories, are being mainly chosen for attack and creating disturbances.
Garments owners and exporters maintain that, in the name of just wages for the workers, some Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) are instigating the workers to create trouble in the factories. They spread discontent among workers under various pretexts and send the news of such unrest to different international media. Such news worries the foreign buyers about the uncertainty of supplies from Bangladesh and makes them choose safe sources of supply elsewhere. Because of the global economic depression, the demand for apparels and the price thereof has fallen significantly in the international market. Owners and exporters of apparels are now in a panic, because of the fear that if in the present adverse global economic situation worker unrest remains widespread, the garments sector will not survive.
BGMEA leaders claim that wage payments of the workers in factories have not been stopped even in this period of international recession. They say, it is not the actual workers of the factories but the occupiers of ‘Jhut’ trading, together with other problems, which create unrest in the garments industries at present. Leaders of the Combined Garment Workers Federation (CGWF) maintain that the problems can be solved through mutual understanding and not by shutting down the factories (Dilal, 11 July 2010, P.13). CGWF leaders admit that there are some pending problems of the ‘actual’ workers in some garments factories. These problems need to be solved by the factory owners either individually at the factory level or collectively at the sector level, so that the national and international self seekers cannot utilize the innocent workers to serve their own heinous purpose.
Some of the privileged labour leaders of the garments industries frequently or occasionally visit various foreign countries under the patronage of some interested national and international quarters. They have amassed huge amount of money and property. They are also accused of blackmailing both the factory owners and the workers of this sector and causing disturbances that erupt from time to time in this successful sector of the Bangladesh economy (Sipu, 5 August 2010, P.1). The concerned parties should remember what Allāh says, “Keep the covenant. Verily! Of the covenant it will be asked.”       
VI. Profit motive of the Garments Owners and
      the Imperialistic Capitalists buyers
For the creation of additional employment for the surplus labour, capital investment in different fields of economic activities is a must, and, in capitalism, “if our interest is in an expanding capitalist sector, the assumption of profit maximization is probably a fair approximation to the truth” (Lewis (1954), 1963, P.407). In capitalism, workers are involved in the process of production, but they are not considered as sharers of the profit. It is permissible to earn a reasonable margin of profit in Islam by producing and trading Halal (permissible) goods and the profit is not appropriated by the producers or traders alone but injunctions have been given that “give the workers a share from the earnings (profits) of their labour; because the workers of Allāh cannot be deprived” (Hadith: Quoted in Dainandin Zibane Islam, 2000, P.500). But we see an entirely different picture in the Bangladesh garments sector at large.
01. The owners of the garments factories spread an idea that if the wage of the workers is increased the factories will incur loss and the result will be the closure of the factories id est. an increase in wages will be ruinous to this ‘golden egg laying’ sector. But this is not at all true. An International Labour Organization (ILO) survey reveals that, the minimum wage of workers of Bangladesh in the garments sector is the lowest compared to other competing countries in the world. Let us have a look at Table IV.   
Table IV. Comparative picture of Minimum Wages and Profit margin
in the Garments Sector of different competing Countries
Countries
Minimum wage in $
per Month
Profit margin
%
               India
                113
               11.8
               Pakistan
                118
               N.A
              Vietnam 
                120
                 6.5
              China
                204
                 3.2
              Bangladesh
                 39
               43.1
Source: Selim, 13 August 2010, P. 19. Bangladeshi minimum wage is corrected in the table. Selim quotes $69, equivalent to Taka 4,830, which is above the new minimum wage that is yet to come in to effect.
The WB estimates of minimum wages given in Table II are at variance with the ILO estimates presented in Table IV. ILO estimates seem to be slightly inflated for countries like India, Pakistan, widely inflated for countries like Vietnam and Bangladesh, and deflated by a wide margin for China, in comparison to WB estimates.
However, even if the wage rate is increased by reducing the rate of profit of the Bangladeshi apparels owners by as much as 50 percent, the profit margin of the Bangladeshi owners will remain higher than that of other competing countries. A Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS) study shows that in Taka 100 worth of Bangladeshi apparels the amount of value added by labour is Taka 31. Of this Taka 31, the worker receives only Taka 7 and the owner takes away Taka 24. Even if the worker is given Taka 15, then also the owner will be able to earn a profit of Taka 16; and if the former account is taken into consideration, even then the profit margin will remain 22% which is still more than that of India, China, and Vietnam. It is common knowledge that if the wage rate is increased, the efficiency of the workers and the productivity of the industry will also increase. Allāh says, “For the best (worker) that thou canst hire is strong, the trustworthy”.28/26 The necessary precondition for this is to pay the worker sufficient wage so that the worker can keep himself/herself mentally and physically healthy for satiety and higher productivity.  
The revised wage structure was declared on 29 July 2010. All concerned naturally assumed that it would come into effect from August 2010. But it was later decided that the new wage structure would come into effect from November 2010. This means that the workers would receive enhanced wage from December 2010, by which time two Eid festivals would be over. Therefore, the purpose of the section of garments owners is very clear. They are desperate to take surreptitiously immense profit over night by keeping the cheap wage situation (Selim, 13 August 2010, P. 19).      
02.  In Bangladesh the garments industry is not at all an isolated issue. International monopoly capital and imperialistic capital is directly connected with it. Along with cloths-threads-buttons etcetera, machineries and equipments id est. everything as a whole is required to be purchased from them. On the other hand, the process of marketing of almost the entire amount of produce is controlled by them. The pre and post process of production is entirely dependent on the multinational companies and imperialist capital and is the prey of their reckless exploitation and deprivation. The renowned foreign companies, including Wal-Mart, sell a shirt at $10 in the shops of New York by purchasing that at $3 from Bangladesh. Their profit will be more if they can purchase at a lower price. Because of that greed they control the.
international market of garments industry in such a manner that the selling countries are compelled to engage among themselves in cut-throat competition to sell their apparels at the cheapest possible price. The apparels producing countries, including Bangladesh, without trying collectively to encounter the exploitations and deprivations by the imperialistic economic powers, which control the equipment of the garments industry and the apparels market, try desperately and sell apparels at low prices to please them. To survive the cut-throat competition to sell the apparels to the foreign buyers along with their purpose to take surreptitiously immense profit the garments industry owners have to try to lower the cost of production as low as possible. The price of raw materials and equipments of the industry is beyond their control; so they usually have almost nothing to do in that regard. Moreover, the Bangladeshi garments owners always try to remain in the good book of whichever government comes to power for availing of the benefits such as tax exemptions, loan facilities, bailing out funds etcetera because of which they are not serious about pressurizing the governments for satisfactory supply of gas and electricity. Therefore, in order to make out a place in the world market, and earn a big amount of profit, the garments owners choose the only way, and that is to give the workers a wage rate as low as possible (Selim, 12 August 2010, P.9). Time has come for the Bangladeshi garments owners to remember that, “It is illegal to sustain loss (yourself) and cause loss to (other)” (Hadith).            
03. In a capitalistic system there always exists a natural conflict between the capitalists and the workers on the question of wages. The lesser the wage, the more is the possibility of increasing the rate of profits by the owners. The owner wants to use the labour power of the worker at the least possible wage. On the other hand the worker wants to increase his wage as far as possible. He wants to get the wage that will enable him lead a minimum possible living standard. It is the question of his existence as a human being. From the owners’ side, the urge to keep down the wage of the worker is an inherent characteristic of capitalism; in the garments industry this is relatively higher. In this tug-war of wage fixation between the owners and the workers, the owners always win. This is what has happened recently in the garments sector of Bangladesh also.        
In Bangladesh, if because of illness the workers fail to go to work any day, no owner of the factory pays them wage. Moreover, if they demand their just due, it is alleged that the owners torture them with the help of hired miscreants (Khan, 24 July 2010, P. 2). Their daily meal is a piece of simple bread in the morning, rice mixed with salt and pungent at noon and rice with vegetable soup at night; as a result many a worker becomes prey of untimely death  (Hasan, 26 July 2010, P. 1). This is contrary to the directives given to the employers in the Hadith as mentioned above, “They (the employees) are your brothers. Allāh has entrusted you with their responsibilities. So those on whom such responsibilities have been entrusted are liable to give them such food as they eat, make arrangement for them to wear such cloths as they wear, and shall never compel them to do such works which are painful and beyond their capacity to do, and if they are to do such works the employees will have to be given necessary assistance to do that piece of work” (Hadith: Bukhari Sharif – Kitabul Imaan). 
04. A few months back, after visiting an apparels industry in Ashulia, the Chairman of an apex US apparels buying organization ‘Jaycee Penny’ expressed deep concern at the recent unstable conditions at the garments factories of Bangladesh and said, “it is impossible for the workers to sustain life at the present wage rate, but it is not possible to increase apparels prices in the US since recession is still continuing there” (Khan, 24 July 2010, P.1). This is just like shedding crocodile tears as the miser westerners usually do by seeing the wretched conditions of the people of the developing countries which are their own creation around the world by exploiting them for decades after decades in the name of development id est., creating “a world after its own image”, after centuries of colonial lootings, oppression and suppression by the sneering British with the help of their local henchmen. The Bangladeshi rising capitalists are following the legacy of the colonial past in the guise of creating employment opportunities for the unemployed males and females of their own origin in the apparels industry, like in all other industries of the country. They follow the western capitalists in the modern sectors (as well as agriculture). Allāh says, “Follow not the footstep of the devil. Verily! he is an open enemy for you.”2/168
05.  A section of the garments owners are loading their pockets with tens of millions of Taka while being reluctant to pay the workers their monthly wage above Taka 2,500. Many garments owners are making millions of Taka by black marketing the cloths coming through shipment, but they are hesitant to pay even Taka 2,500 per month to the workers. They are not even regular in their monthly payments to the workers whatever low wage they commit them to pay. For not being paid for 2/3 months, incidents of workers’ discontents and conflicts spread afterwards in those garments factories. On the other hand, the owners of these factories have taken tens of millions of Taka bank loans in the name of these garments factories, and are being forgiven for not paying off such debts.
BGMEA has built a luxurious building the purpose of which was to create experienced manpower in the garments sector and to provide the workers with health care facilities. But training facilities are there only in name, while BGMEA is receiving tens of millions of Taka as commissions from shipment per year (Khayer, 29 July 2010, P. 2). The BGMEA building, the concrete peak of vulgar pomp and wealth, is covering the sky of the capital city when garments workers are passing their days in everywhere in Bangladesh intolerable poverty. Allāh says, “O ye who believe! Squander not your wealth among yourselves in vanity, except it is a trade by mutual consent, and kill not one another
serein

Serein

Serein is an English-language documentary newspaper published in Dhaka, Bangladesh, founded in 2017.

Post A Comment:

0 comments: